Nora Should Stay essays

Nora Should Stay essays Ibsen made a very controversial act, by having Nora leave her husband and her family. After first reading the play I thought that what Nora did was the right thing to do. But after thinking about I now realize that wasn't the right thing to do. Yes, Torvald was not the best husband in the world, but Nora should have considered that before she married him. To turn your back on your spouse is one thing, but to turn your back on your children is another. Nora was around in an era were women were looked down upon, not considered equal to men, so it would be hard for her to find a job. If Nora were to leave her Torvald she would have no were to go. Nora was a doll all of her life, first to her father then to Torvald, if she were to leave more then likely she would just become someone else's doll. Torvald was not the best husband in the world, but Nora chose to marry him. Nora never really got a chance to know Torvald. Torvald had his eye on Nora from the beginning. So he help her father and for that Nora was grateful, and thus became Mr. & Mrs. Helmer. It sounds like a very romantic story, but little did Nora know what would be in store for her. Torvald treated Nora like she was his child, I guess that is because he took no part in raising his children the he and Nora had together. If Nora would have taken the time to find out if Torvald was the one for her, then maybe it wouldn't have taken her eight years to realize that she never really loved him. If you are unhappy in your home then you leave your spouse, but you are never to leave your children. Even though Nora never really spent much time with her children she loved them to death. When Nora finally decided to turn her back on Torvald she decided to turn her back on her children as well. It might not have affected the children right away, but eventually it would have. Girls need a women figure to talk to about female things. Not only that but if Nora left and then later on down the ...

Gladiators essays

Gladiators essays Throughout history the gladiatorial games found great distinction and prestige from any other type of entertainment of its time. The first games were held in Rome in 264 BC by the two sons of Junius Brutus Pera, as a type of commemorative service in their fathers honour. After these first games word spread and interest rose exponentially. At the first games there was a total of three matches, by the time Julius Caesar was in power he had promised 320 matches for his daughter. At this point it was no longer a religious ceremony but rather had become a political event to show the elites power. These commemorative games were only to be held twice a year during the winter and summer equinox. In general, gladiators were condemned criminals, prisoners of war or slaves that were purchased for the purpose of combat. There were also professional gladiators who were men which participated of their own free will in the games. Due to the enthusiasm and skill that they possessed history shows that the spectators much preferred to witness the free men battling then the enslaved ones. Men became gladiators because they gained immediate status in society even though the gladiatorial oath forced them to act as slaves to their master and "to endure branding, chains, flogging, or death by the sword" (Petronius Satyricon, 117.5), therefore the professional gladiators were known for their loyalty, courage and discipline. The men were willing to face this, not only for their status but also to gain popularity and wealth. Young Roman boys would always associate hang around with them and try and learn the tricks of the trade. These men easily attracted many matrons, for the women enjoyed having affairs with such prestigious men. These professionals were trained in private or imperial schools known as ludi. Men became specialists in combat techniques that could capture their opponents rather then kill them quickly, because after all they were t...

Patient Safety - QSEN Initiative Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Patient Safety - QSEN Initiative - Term Paper Example To enrich the quality of treatment given to patients, it was realized that nursing standards need to be raised and standardised. ‘Innovation in nursing education is the key to improving quality and safety.’(Enhancing Quality and Education in Nursing Education, 2012) Hence, the basic need was to provide nurses with the Knowledge, skills and Attitude (KSAs) by training the nursing faculties through the help of medical institutes.The nursing faculties then formally train the nurses, thus, improving nursing performance and quality. To resolve this issue, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) laid foundations for a project, Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) via phase-wise funding.Through RWJF, strategies and policies were developed and implemented to ensure that‘future nursing graduates develop competencies in patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality improvement, safety, and informatics’.(Enhancing Quali ty and Education in Nursing Education, 2012).According to ‘Integrating QSEN Competencies’, The QSEN project is categorized into three phases of action. 2005-2007 Phase I Pre-licensure Education 2007-2009 Phase II Graduate Education and Pilot School Collaborative 2009-2011 Phase III Faculty Development to Achieve Curriculum Integration The concern today is that there is stilllack of qualified, good-quality nursing staff in general (Hinshaw 2001). That can be roughly depicted as the growth in number of patients is much higher than the growth in patient-centered nursing staff. This lack extra burden on the existing system of nursing staff and institutions. Thus, during this shortage, it becomes a bigger challenge to conduct QSEN processes and ensure quality maintenance. The issue of shortage not only concerns the nursing staff, but it also exists in the number of nursing faculty that trains the nursing staff while utilizing QSEN standards. A future issue which can cause in efficiencies and counter-productivity is keeping in-check the size and number of trained nurses. When an institute produces its products in terms of trained individuals, credibility is often judged by quality of performance by the alumni. Hence, if there ever exists a period of low performances by nurses, the whole process will become counter-productive and might cease to be perceived as viable any more. The nursing leaders aim to take this initiative forward by stressing the importance of role-models in the nursing staff. During practical duty hours, role models are the figureheads who channel the treatment objectives and quality standards in the right way. They should be able to correct inappropriate processes while bringing the whole environment a positive air. It also serves to instigate a feeling of self-fulfilment in the nurses. Another step taken to enhance nursing environment is to allow nurses to take ownership of their specific wards. That means nurses can be allowed more control of their own wards and the nursing operations in the dedicated premises (Ford 2009). The very idea to develop and introduce the QSEN program to the nursing schools and healthcare system is a very commendable step. The three-phased project encircles the needs of the patients, the nurses and the faculty as well. For the betterment of patients in hospitals and hospital care, in general, it is of great significance Feedback and opinion-taking surveys area good inclusions to the QSEN project. This

Supplied case study examining understanding of key positive Essay

Supplied case study examining understanding of key positive psychological concepts in a service organisation - Essay Example the patients, especially in the field of mental health wherein â€Å"mental health services rely on human resources (staff) to a much greater degree than other medical and health disciplines (Thornicroft & Tansella, 1999 cited in World Health Organization (WHO), 2003). Since the mental health services are primarily delivered by the direct care providers (physicians, psychiatrists, nurses, aides, and alike), it is essential for them to not only have the competence but also be in their optimum health and well being to be efficient in providing positive services for better patient care and thus, greater productivity outcomes.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   In connection, this paper will emphasize the practices and services that will offer the organizational staff of Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Services ways to reach optimal health and well being that will show their improved competency needed in the delivery of better mental health services. Specifically, it is deemed significant to examine the benefits of positive psychological approaches in comparison to the current service-delivery trends of the hospital, as well as to identify the activities required to acquire these approaches, and to recognize the three key positive psychological concepts (among others) which must be utilized by the staff to reach the goals set by the organization of Ontario Shores.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Science or simply known as Ontario Shores is a public mental health institution formerly called as Whitby Mental Health Centre. Located at 700 Gordon Street, Whitby, Ontario, Canada, the hospital functions under the Public Hospital Act, the Mental Health Act, and other provincial and federal legislative enactments and offers a 329-bed capacity for its inpatient program along with its out-patient care services. The organization staff of the Ontario Shores is made up of 1, 100 employees oriented and mobilized at providing â€Å"leadership and exemplary mental health care

Birch Paper Case Essay Example for Free

Birch Paper Case Essay The division cant very well show a profit by putting in bids that dont even cover a fair share of overheadcosts,let alone give us a profit. Birch Paper Company was a medium-sized,partly integrated paper company, producing white and kraft papers and paperboard. A portion of its paperboard output was converted into corrugated boxes by the Thompson Division, which also printed and colored the outside surface of the boxes. Including Thompson,the companyhad four producingdivisions and a timberland division, which supplied part of the companyspulp requirements. For severalyears, eachdivision had beenjudged independently on the basis of its profit and return on investment. Top managementhad been working to gain effectiveresults from a policy of decentralizing responsibility and authority for all decisionsexcept those relating to overall companypolicy. The companys top officials believed that in the past few years the concept of decentralization had been applied successfullyand that the companysprofits and competitive position definitely had improved. The Northern Division had designeda special display box for one of its papers in conjunction with the ThompsonDivision, which was equippedto make the box. Thompsonsstaff for packagedesign and developmentspent several months perfecting the design, production methods,and materials to be used. Becauseof the unusual color and shape, these were far from standard. According to an agreement between the two divisions, the Thompson Division was reimbursed by the Northern Division for the cost of its design and developmentwork. When all the specificationswere prepared,the Northern Division askedfor bids on the box from the ThompsonDivision and from two outside companies. Each division manager was normally free to buy from whatever supplier he wished, and evenon saleswithin the company, divisions were expectedto meet the going market price if they wanted the business. During this period, the profit margins of such converters as the Thompson Division were being squeezed. Thompson,as did many other similar converters,bought its paperboard,and its function was to print, cut, and shapeit into boxes. Though it bought most of its materials from other Birch divisions, most of Thompsonssaleswere made to outside customers. If Thompsongot the order from Northern, it probably would buy its linerboard and corrugating medium from the Southern Division of Birch. The walls of a corrugated box This case was prepared by William Rotch under the supervision of Neil Harlan, Harvard Business School. Copyright 158-001. by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Harvard Business School case i Case6-2 Birch PaperCompany 2 consist of outside and inside sheets of linerboard sandwiching the fluted corrugating medium. About 70 percent of Thompsons out-of-pocketcostof$400 for the order representedthe cost of linerboard and corrugating medium. Though Southern had beenrunning below capacity and had excess inventory, it quoted the market price, which had not noticeably weakenedas a result of the oversupply. Its out-of-pocket costs on both liner and corrugating medium were about 60 percent of the selling price. The Northern Division receivedbids on the boxesof $480 a thousand from the ThompsonDivision, $430 a thousand from West Paper Company,and $432 a thousand from Eire Papers,Ltd. Eire Papers offered to buy from Birch the outside linerboard with the specialprinting already on it, but would supply its own inside liner and corrugating medium. The outside liner would be supplied by the Southern Division at a price equivalent of $90 a thousand boxes,and it would be printed for $30 a thousand by the Thompson Division. Of the $30, about $25 would be out-of-pocketcosts. Since this situation appearedto be a little unusual, William Kenton, manager of the Northern Division, discussedthe wide discrepancy of bids with Birchs commercialvice president. He told the vice president:We sell in a very competitivemarket, where higher costscannot be passedon. How canwe be expectedto show a decent profit and return on investment if we have to buy our supplies at more than 10 percent over the going market? Knowing that Mr. Brunner on occasionin the past few months had beenunable to operate the Thompson Division at capacity,it seemedodd to the vice president that Mr. Brunner would add the full 20 percent overheadand profit chargeto his out-of-pocketcosts. When he was asked about this, Mr. Brunners answer was the statement that appears at the beginning of the case. He went on to say that having donethe developmentalwork on the box, and having receivedno profit on that, he felt entitled to a goodmarkup on the production of the box itself. The vice president explored further the cost structures of the various divisions. He remembereda comment that the controller had made at a meeting the week before to the effect that costs which were variable for one division could be largely fIXedfor the companyas a whole. He knew that in the absence of specific orders from top management Mr. Kenton would acceptthe lowest bid, which was that of the West Paper Companyfor $430. However,it would be possiblefor top managementto order the acceptance another bid if the situof ation warranted such action. And though the volume representedby the transactionsin questionwas less than 5 percent of the volume of any of the divisions involved, other transactions would conceivablyraise similar problemslater. Questions 1. Which bid should Northern Division acceptthat is in the best interests of Birch Paper Company? 2. Should Mr. Kenton acceptthis bid? Why or why not? 3. Should the vice president of Birch Paper Companytake any action? 4. In the controversydescribed,how,if at all, is the transfer price system dysfunctional? Doesthis problem call for somechange,or changes, the transin fer pricing policy of the overall firm? If so, what specific changesdo you suggest?

BonJours Basic Antifoundationalist Argument :: Philosophy Philosophical Papers

BonJour's 'Basic Antifoundationalist Argument' ABSTRACT: BonJour argues that there can be no basic empirical beliefs. But premises three and four jointly entail ‘BonJour’s Rule’ — one’s belief that p is justified only if one justifiably believes the premises of an argument that makes p highly likely — which, given human psychology, entails global skepticism. His responses to the charge of skepticism, restricting premise three to basic beliefs and noting that the Rule does not require ‘explicit’ belief, fail. Moreover, the Rule does not express an epistemic duty. Finally, his argument against this fails since it is false that if an experiential state has representational content, then it is in need of justification. I venture the diagnosis that BonJour mistook the representational content of a cognitive state for the assertive functional role of a belief. Foundationalism may well be false, but not for BonJour’s reasons. Laurence BonJour observes that critics of foundationalism tend to argue against it by objecting to "relatively idiosyncratic" versions of it, a strategy which has "proven in the main to be superficial and ultimately ineffective" since answers immune to the objections emerge quickly. (1) BonJour aims to rectify this deficiency. Specifically, he argues that the very soul of foundationalism, "the concept of a basic empirical belief," is incoherent. (2) This is a bold strategy from which we can learn even if, in the end, as I shall argue, it fails. But, first, what is foundationalism? A person's belief is ‘nonbasic’ just in case it is justified in virtue of its relation to other justified beliefs; it is ‘basic’ just in case it is justified but not in virtue of its relation to other justified beliefs. Foundationalism is the view that if one has a nonbasic belief, then — in the final analysis — it is justified in virtue of its relation to a basic belief. Basic beliefs comprise the foundation of a person's network of justified beliefs. Now to BonJour's argument. 1. The Argument Stated BonJour summarizes it like this: 1. Suppose, for reductio, that there are basic empirical beliefs. 2. A belief is justified only if there is a reason why it is likely to be true. 3. A belief is justified for a person only if he is in cognitive possession of such a reason. 4. A person is in cognitive possession of such a reason only if he believes with justification the premises from which it follows that the belief is likely to be true.

Gravity Assignment

You will be helping Galileo perform the experiment to determine if objects with different mass fall at the same, or different, rates in the air and in a vacuum. Before you conduct your experiment, you need to form a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a prediction of what you think will happen in the experiment. The hypothesis is a statement that describes â€Å"if† a certain set of circumstances are present â€Å"then† there will be a specific result that will occur.Record your hypothesis here: My hypothesis is that i think that the heavier ball will always drop first in the vacuumRecord the results from step one of the experiment (dropping the objects in the air):First trial: The big ball fell faster than the small ballSecond trial: The small ball fell faster than the featherThird trial: The big ball fell faster than the featherRecord the results from step two of the experiment (dropping the objects in a vacuum):First trial: The feather and the small ball hit the ground at th e same timeSecond trial:The big ball and the small ball hit the ground at the same timeThird trial: The bigger ball and the feather hit the ground at the exact same timeDid the experiment support your hypothesis? Using the data from your experiment, describe why you believe your hypothesis was either proven or disproven. My hypothesis wasnt proven because all the objects regarless of weight and acceleration all hit the ground at the exact same rate and time.What forces were acting on the objects dropped in the air? What force was acting on the objects dropped in the vacuum? The force acting upon the objects dropped in the air was air resistance and gravity. The force acting upon the objects dropped in the vacuum was gravity only.Part two: Comparing ForcesChoose two forces and compare and contrast these forces. You must provide two ways that they are alike and two ways that they are different. You may make a list, write in paragraph form, or make a chart. The strong nuclear is differ ent from the weak nuclear because the strong nuclear holds an atoms nucleus together and a weak nuclear governs nuclear decay and radioactivity.Strong nuclear is the strongest of the four forces where as the weak nuclear is the second weakest of all four forces. There alike because they both have a short range of force and there particles and subatomic particles experience the same forceChoose two forces and compare and contrast these forces. These must be different forces than used in the prior question. Provide two ways that they are similar and two ways that they are different. You may make a list, write it out, or make a chart.Gravity is different from electro-magnetism because gravity is the attraction between objects with mass and electro-magnetismis the attraction or repulsion between electrically charged particles. Gravity is the weakest of the four forces and electro-magnetism is the second strongest of the four forces. there alike because they both have infinity range of f orce and they both attract forces